Skip to main content
· 8/7/1995

Ronald S. Wilson v. International Business MacHines Corporation

Citations

  • 62 F.3d 237
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 20681
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,675
  • 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1019
  • 1995 WL 461577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that to withstand summary judgment, the non-moving party “must substantiate his allegations with sufficient probative evidence [that] would permit a finding in [his] favor based on more than mere speculation, conjecture, or fantasy.” (alterations in original
  • defendant entitled to summary judgment if plaintiff cannot establish a factual dispute on an element of its cause of action (citing Bialas v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 59 F.3d 759, 762 (8th Cir.1995))
  • vague and conclusory arguments not properly before the court
  • vague and conclusory arguments not properly before the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Henley, Magill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.