Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Rooker–Feldman doctrine is jurisdictional and may therefore be raised sua sponte
• stating that the Rooker–Feldman doctrine is jurisdictional and may therefore be raised sua sponte
• plaintiffs’ remedy for alleged misrepresentations in state court proceedings, “if any, is to return to state court and utilize its procedures for remedying fraud”
• “[I]n the usual case in which all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors to be considered under the pendent jurisdiction doctrine . . . will point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.”
• “‘[I]n the usual case in which all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors to be considered under the pendent jurisdiction doctrine . . . will point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.’”
• “[I]n the usual case in which all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors to be considered under [28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3)] . . . will point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).