Ronald R. Bell v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to offer proof of impermissible motives for choosing to prosecute in federal forum precludes finding of due process violation
• holding interpretation of a sentencing court's ambiguous order was matter to be raised through a § 2255 motion for post-conviction relief district that imposed the sentence
• explaining that district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear petitioner’s § 2241 petition because petitioner “was not incarcerated in the Eastern District of Missouri”
• explaining that district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear petitioner’s § 2241 petition because petitioner “was not incarcerated in the Eastern District of Missouri”
• holding interpretation of a sentencing court’s ambiguous order was matter to be raised through a § 2255 motion for post-conviction relief district that imposed the sentence
• “If he chooses to file a 2241 petition, [the federal prisoner] must do so in a court with jurisdiction over his present custodian.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).