Ronald Mitchell v. Justin Schlabach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that a clerical error mischaracterizing a prior state conviction did not warrant a resentencing
• affirming denial of request for resentencing under Rule 36 based on claim of substantive, not clerical, error in presentence report
• affirming denial of request for resentencing under Rule 36 based on claim of substantive, not clerical, error in presentence report
• affirming denial of request for resentencing under Rule 36 based on claim of substantive, not clerical, error in presentence report
• applying Rule 36 exclusively to clerical errors, not substantive errors
• applying Rule 36 exclusively to clerical errors, not substantive errors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).