· 2/24/1989
Ronald Mays v. Chicago Sun-Times and Graphic Communications Union, Chicago Paper Handlers' & Electrotypers' Local No. 2, Afl-Cio
Citations
- 865 F.2d 134
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- fining appellant’s attorney $1,000 for submitting state- ments in his brief that were “not well-grounded in fact or law”
- fining appellant’s attorney $1,000 for submitting state- ments in his brief that were “not well-grounded in fact or law”
- fining appellant’s attorney $1,000 for submitting state- ments in his brief that were “not well-grounded in fact or law”
- fining appellant’s attorney $1,000 for submitting state- ments in his brief that were “not well-grounded in fact or law”
- sanctioning attorney for falsely imputing posi- tions on opponents and the court
- sanctioning attorney for falsely imputing positions on opponents and the court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Flaum, Easterbrook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.