Ronald Kincade v. City Of Blue Springs, Missouri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding mere assertion that contested speech \adversely affected the efficiency of City's operations and substantially disrupted the work environment\ with no supporting evidence is insufficient to place Pickering balance at issue
• finding mere assertion that contested speech “adversely affected the efficiency of City’s operations and substantially disrupted the work environment” with no supporting evidence is insufficient to place Pickering balance at issue
• analyzing Swint v. Chambers County Commission, 115 S. Ct. 1203 (1995
• employee’s comments regarding city dam project touched upon matters of public concern and were constitutionally protected, as required for First Amendment unlawful discharge claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).