Skip to main content
· 8/16/2016

Ronald Kelvin Perry v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “the determination of whether a person is under the influence of an alcoholic beverage is focused on the conduct and demeanor of the person”
  • denying relief because “we are confident Hutton was not induced to consent to the test by the inclusion of the incorrect excess verbiage in the advisory”
  • “Despite the statutory presumption of consent, a person may refuse to submit to chemical testing.”
  • “Ambiguity may arise either from the meaning of particular words or from the general scope and meaning of a statute when all its provisions are examined.” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.