· 7/23/1992
Ronald James, and Kay James v. United States
Citations
- 970 F.2d 750
- 70 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5440
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16599
- 1992 WL 170620
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiffs pro se materials raised “colorable arguments about the procedures used for notification, assessment, and collection of the deficiency against [the plaintiff], and not just about the validity of the assessment itself’
- rejecting taxpayer's arguments regarding invalid OMB numbers and violations of PRA
- Lack of an OMB number on IRS forms and notices does not violate the PRA
- lack of an OMB number on IRS forms and notices does not violate the PRA
- \lack of an OMB number on IRS notices and forms does not violate\ the PRA
- Lack of an OMB number on IRS notices and forms does not violate the PRA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Logan, Barrett, Ebel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.