Ronald Jackson v. Albany Appeal Bureau Unit, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)’s requirement of a certificate of appealability applies to Rule 59(e) motions
• reasoning that the congressional mandate to weed out unmeritorious appeals requires COAs for Rule 59(e) denials
• applying reasoning from Rule 60(b) context and requiring a COA to appeal from the denial of a Rule 59(e) motion in a habeas proceeding
• upholding district court’s dismissal of habeas petition pursuant to Rule 2(c) where petition was unintelligible
• requiring a COA to appeal from the denial of a Rule 59(e) motion relating to a habeas judgment
• habeas petitioner's amended petition was unintelligible, warranting dismissal pursuant to Rule 2(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).