RONALD J. MARZULLO v. JOYCE MARZULLO, A/K/A JOYCE BRYAN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a complaint alleged that a corporate committee maintained a retirement plan because “the powers referred to in the complaint include interpreting and applying the [p|lan, the monitoring of fiduciaries, and all powers necessary to carry out the [p]lan”
• explaining that a statute’s undefined terms are given their ordinary meaning based on dictionary definitions at the time Congress enacted the statute
• “Dicta is ‘a judicial comment made while delivering a judicial opinion, but one that is unnecessary to the decision in the case and therefore not precedential.’” (alterations omitted
• “Because Sanzone does not contest that the Committee’s primary purpose is administering the [p|lan and that it is associated with the Catholic church, the parties’ arguments focus on whether the Committee (a) maintains the [p]lan and (b) constitutes an organization.”
• “When a district court fails to address a matter properly presented to it, we ordinarily remand to give the court an opportunity to rule in the first instance.” (quoting GEICO Cas. Co. v. Isaacson, 932 F.3d 721, 724 (8th Cir. 2019))
• detailing similar, albeit more modern, definitions of organization

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).