Skip to main content
· 4/14/1997

Ronald H. HANEBRINK, Appellant, v. BROWN SHOE COMPANY, Appellee

Citations

  • 110 F.3d 644
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 6762
  • 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,673
  • 73 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 865
  • 1997 WL 174838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a half a year decline in the average age of the employee group was insufficient to raise an inference of age discrimination
  • finding evidence of a younger person assuming job responsibilities of an older displaced worker by itself was not enough to prove the prima facie case
  • finding a half a year decline in the average age of the employee group was insufficient to raise an inference of age discrimination
  • no inference of age discrimination where employer retained two employees who were older than plaintiff
  • “Employment decisions motivated by characteristics other than age such as salary and pension benefits, even when such characteristics correlate with age, do not constitute age discrimination.”
  • “[W]e emphasize that employers are free to make their own business decisions, even inefficient ones, so long as they do not discriminate unlawfully.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hansen, Arnold, Melloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.