Ronald H. Boyle v. Catherine C. Boyle Donovan, Ronald H. Boyle, II and Robert E. Boyle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the bankruptcy court’s finding that the debtor’s obligation to fund children’s college and post-graduate education was in the nature of support
• the fact that such education was “part of the family pattern of life” supported the finding that the payments were intended as support
• bankruptcy court should not “examine the present situation of the parties”
• “That the debtor had no duty under Arkansas law to pay for his sons’ education does not mean that he and his ex-wife could not have intended the college expense agreement to function as support.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).