Ronald F. Butera v. Jack L. Cottey, Sherriff of Marion County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that supervisors must be aware of a substantial risk of harm to be liable
• holding that supervisors must be aware of a substantial risk of harm to be liable
• ruling that a prisoner’s report to jail personnel that he was “having problems in the block” and “needed to be removed” was 4 insufficient to establish deliberate indifference (alteration omitted)
• finding that the Sheriff was not on notice of a substantial risk of harm to the plaintiff, therefore he was not deliberately indifferent
• finding that statements by a prisoner that he was “having problems in the block” and “needed to be removed” were insufficient to establish deliberate indifference
• finding that statements by a prisoner that he was “having problems in the block” and “needed to be removed” were insufficient to establish deliberate indifference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).