Ronald Engstrand v. Carolyn Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ erred by assuming a connection between a 10-gram monofilament test and the plaintiff’s reported pain where no correlation was made by any provider within the medical record
• stating that to uphold an ALJ’s decision, “it must rest on substantial evidence . . . untainted by an erroneous credibility finding”
• finding that “the ALJ’s flawed credibility finding hindered her ability to appropriately weigh other favorable evidence,” including an opinion from the claimant's treating physician
• finding that the ALJ’s “flawed credibility finding hindered her ability to appropriately weigh other favorable evidence,” including the opinion of the claimant’s treating physician
• finding that the ALJ’s “flawed credibility finding hindered her ability to appropriately weigh other favorable evidence,” including the opinion of the claimant's treating physician
• finding that the ALJ wrongly evaluated the significance of the claimant’s reported activities, which were consistent with the claimant’s testimony as to his limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).