Ronald Edward Gillette v. Robert J. Tansy and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court abused its discretion in not allowing amendment where the new claims tracked the factual background set forth with the original claims
• holding that appellant's intent to poison a mother was transferred to the children in the family who were also exposed to the poison so as to support a charge of attempted murder of the children
• concluding no prejudice existed were the petitioner’s amended claims “track the factual situations set forth in his [original] claims”
• finding no evidence of prejudice when the “Petitioner’s [amended] claims track the factual situations set forth in his [original] claims.”
• finding no evidence of prejudice when the “Petitioner’s [amended] claims track the factual situations set forth in his [original] claims”
• finding no prejudice where the new claim “track[ed] the factual situation” in the original complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).