Ronald Dwayne Whitfield v. Clear Lake Nissan and Santander Consumer USA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plea in bar claiming double jeopardy would not have been successful and, therefore, trial counsel’s failure to pursue it does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel
• finding no error in a ruling barring certain cross-examination under Rule 608(b) where the prior conduct at issue was not “relevant, whether directly or inferentially, to the [witness]’s character for truthfulness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).