Ronald Andermann v. Sprint Spectrum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court must respect the parties’ “dispute-resolution preferences as embodied in an arbitration clause”
• holding that a court must respect the parties’ “dispute‐ resolution preferences as embodied in an arbitration clause”
• signatory sold entire cell-service contract to party seeking to arbitrate
• “Sprint,” the assignee, “had stepped into U.S. Cellular’s shoes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).