· 7/25/2013
Ron Teague v. Arkansas Board of Education
Citations
- 720 F.3d 973
- 2013 WL 3822112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that repeal or expiration of a challenged law will moot the case unless it “is virtually certain that the repealed law will be reenacted”
- vacating the district court judgment after the case became moot in light of the relevant statute's repeal
- “[W]e will dismiss as moot a case in which changed circumstances have already provided the requested relief and eliminated the need for court action.” (quotation omitted) (cleaned up)
- “[W]e will dismiss as moot a case in which ‘changed circumstances [have] already provide[d] the requested relief and eliminate[d] the need for court action.’” (second, third, and fourth alteration in original)
- addressing a case mooted by a legislative change
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Murphy, Colloton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.