Skip to main content
· 7/25/2013

Ron Teague v. Arkansas Board of Education

Citations

  • 720 F.3d 973
  • 2013 WL 3822112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that repeal or expiration of a challenged law will moot the case unless it “is virtually certain that the repealed law will be reenacted”
  • vacating the district court judgment after the case became moot in light of the relevant statute's repeal
  • “[W]e will dismiss as moot a case in which changed circumstances have already provided the requested relief and eliminated the need for court action.” (quotation omitted) (cleaned up)
  • “[W]e will dismiss as moot a case in which ‘changed circumstances [have] already provide[d] the requested relief and eliminate[d] the need for court action.’” (second, third, and fourth alteration in original)
  • addressing a case mooted by a legislative change

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Murphy, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.