Skip to main content
· 5/17/2017

Ron O. Young v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a state court’s conclusion that the petitioner’s stun belt was not visible to the jury because it was worn under the petitioner’s clothes was not an unreasonable determination of the facts
  • holding that a state court’s conclusion that the petitioner’s stun belt was not visible to the jury because it was worn under the petitioner’s clothes was not an unreasonable determination of the facts
  • “It is especially difficult to succeed with an ineffective assistance claim questioning the strategic decisions of trial counsel who were informed of the available evidence.”
  • “It is especially difficult to succeed with an ineffective assistance claim questioning the strategic decisions of trial counsel who were informed of the available evidence.”
  • “[I]t is rarer still for merit to be found in a claim that challenges a strategic decision of counsel.”
  • “It is especially difficult to succeed with an ineffective assistance claim questioning the strategic decisions of trial counsel who were informed of the available evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.