Ron Johnson v. Express One International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he omission of that language is critical because the rule of Weingarten . . . is grounded upon it”
• holding that “the absence of the explicit right ‘to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of . . . other mutual aid or protection’ in the [Railway Labor Act] proves fatal” to petitioner’s claim that the Act granted the Weingarten right
• warning against applying NLRA case law to statutes with language that “differs substantially” from the NLRA
• warning against applying NLRA case law to statutes with language that “differs substantially” from the NLRA
• ‘The RLA .. . governs employer/employee relations with respect to common carriers by air.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).