Romp v. Jean-Pierre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Walden requires more because “the plaintiff cannot be the only link between the defendant and the forum”
• rejecting theory that “a defendant should be subject to personal jurisdiction in any state at which it ‘aimed its actions.’”
• \Knowing about a potential for harm in a particular state is not the same as acting in that state-and it takes the latter to permit personal jurisdiction under state law.\
• finding plaintiff failed to make such a showing under Calder and stressing that the third-party clients the defendant allegedly wrongfully engaged in business with were not located in Illinois
• “Knowing about a potential for harm in a particular forum is not the same as acting in that state—and it takes the latter to permit personal jurisdiction under state law.”
• “Knowing about a potential for harm in a particular state is not the same as acting in that state—and it takes the latter to permit personal jurisdiction under state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).