Romo v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing jurisdiction arguments as frivolous because federal courts have subject matter and personal jurisdiction over defendants brought before them on federal indictments alleging violations of federal law
• dismissing jurisdiction arguments as frivolous because federal courts have subject matter and personal jurisdiction over defendants brought before them on federal indictments alleging violations of federal law
• relying on United States v. Burke, 425 F.3d 400, 408 (7th Cir. 2005) to explain that a defendant's presence in the territory of the United States supplies personal jurisdiction
• a district court has jurisdiction over “any defendant brought before it on a federal indictment charging a violation of federal law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).