Skip to main content
· 8/4/2000

Rommy Revson, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cinque & Cinque, P.C., Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellee

Citations

  • 221 F.3d 59
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \equivocal contract provisions are generally to be construed against the drafter\
  • noting that “equivocal contract provisions are generally to be construed against the drafter”
  • “Accordingly, issues of contract interpretation are generally matters of law and therefore suitable for disposition on a motion to dismiss.”
  • providing for payment of invoices issued up to and including the month when the notice of termination was received in the event of a termination for convenience
  • “Under New York law, the meaning of a contract that is unambiguous is a question of law for the court to decide.”
  • “Under New York law, the meaning of a contract that is unambiguous is a question of law for the court to decide.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Calabresi, Katzmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.