Romik v. Sech
Citations
- 25 Pa. Super. 97
- 1904 Pa. Super. LEXIS 22
Syllabus
<p>Trial — Charge of court — Answer to point.</p> <p>A judgment will not be reversed because the trial judge in declining a point uses the following language: “I feel constrained by the authority of the Supreme Court as I understand it, and as it has been interpreted by other judges,‘to decline to affirm that point .... personally and without such authority I should be disposed to affirm this point as a proposition of law, but in the face of what I consider the authority of the Supreme Court, I feel bound to decline to affirm it.”</p>
Judges: Beaver, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.