Skip to main content
· 4/13/1995

Romesh Japra, M.D., F.A.C.C., Inc. v. Apte (In Re Apte)

Citations

  • 180 B.R. 223
  • 33 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1269
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3467
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 11341
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 553
  • 1995 WL 256357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the bankruptcy court “erred to the extent that it held that § 523(a)(2)(A) and § 523(a)(6) [were] mutually exclusive”
  • stating that reasonable reliance is a purely objective standard whereas justifiable reliance is a mixture of objective and subjective standards
  • investigation by the defrauded party is not a prerequisite to recovery under the Ninth Circuit’s justifiable reliance standard
  • \Many cases which arise under § 523(a)(6) concern the alleged conversion by the debtor of the plaintiff's property or the alleged conversion by the debtor of property subject to a security interest.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Russell, Ollason

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.