Romero v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that not only must the variance between the charged and proved offenses be material, the defendant must raise the variance in the trial court, as by motion for judgment of acquittal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vesta Const. v. Lotspeich & Associates
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-22· cited 22×
• Banasik v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-10· cited 2×
• Moore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-03

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lewis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1951-07-24· cited 18×
• Hunt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-06-20· cited 14×
• Ross v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-27· cited 10×
• Grissom v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-10-30· cited 10×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-04-03· cited 10×
• McNeal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-12-03· cited 9×
• Atwell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-19· cited 8×
• Frazier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-11-08· cited 1×