Skip to main content

Romero v. State

Citations

  • 815 P.2d 628
  • 112 N.M. 332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • cautioning against imposing “an unduly restrictive interpretation [of] both [the] admissibility of relevant evidence and on the term ‘maintenance.’”
  • “The trial court [is] in the best position to determine if, in the overall context of the case, evidence ... was relevant.”
  • “The trial court was in the best position to determine if, in the overall context of the case, evidence ... was relevant[.]”
  • evidence relating to the absence of plan or design of roadway held relevant to claim for damages alleging negligent maintenance of roadway
  • state has burden of producing evidence of plan or design of highway in order to show entitlement to “design” exception to statutory waiver of immunity
  • question of whether condition of road was matter of design or maintenance required evidence of design or plan of road

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sosa, Ransom, Baca

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.