· 7/21/1994
Romero v. Parkhill, Smith & Cooper, Inc.
Citations
- 881 S.W.2d 522
- 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 1853
- 1994 WL 380952
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that holding in Hunt only applies to cases in which property owner is suing architect for breach of contract that both parties entered into
- explaining that holding in Hunt only applies to cases in which property owner is suing architect for breach of contract that both parties entered into
- explaining that holding in Hunt only applies to cases in which property owner is suing architect for breach of contract that both parties entered into
- explaining that holding in Hunt only applies to cases in which property owner is suing architect for breach of contract that both parties entered into
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barajas, Koehler, Larsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.