Skip to main content
· 7/21/1994

Romero v. Parkhill, Smith & Cooper, Inc.

Citations

  • 881 S.W.2d 522
  • 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 1853
  • 1994 WL 380952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that holding in Hunt only applies to cases in which property owner is suing architect for breach of contract that both parties entered into
  • explaining that holding in Hunt only applies to cases in which property owner is suing architect for breach of contract that both parties entered into
  • explaining that holding in Hunt only applies to cases in which property owner is suing architect for breach of contract that both parties entered into
  • explaining that holding in Hunt only applies to cases in which property owner is suing architect for breach of contract that both parties entered into

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barajas, Koehler, Larsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.