Romero v. Lamantia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a party proving fraud must meet the more exacting standard of clear and convincing evidence, which is a higher standard of persuasion than mere preponderance of the evidence
• explaining that a party proving fraud must meet the more exacting standard of clear and convincing evidence, which is a higher standard of persuasion than mere preponderance of the evidence
• stating it is an appellant’s responsibility to ensure the certified record is complete for this Court’s review on appeal
• “[T]he fact that the [plaintiffs] proved fraud by the preponderance of the evidence in the Bankruptcy Court does not establish that they met their burden of proving fraud by clear and convincing evidence[,] [so] the collateral estoppel doctrine is foreclosed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).