· 8/13/2008
Romero-Ruiz v. Mukasey
Citations
- 538 F.3d 1057
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 17170
- 2008 WL 3388478
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming denial of motion to reopen because, inter alia, the motion “was not 2 accompanied by an application for cancellation of removal”
- the requirements for a motion to reopen and a motion to remand are the same
- “The formal requirements for a motion to reopen and a motion to remand are the same.”
- “The formal requirements of a motion to remand and a motion to reopen are the same.”
- “The formal requirements of a motion to remand and a motion to reopen are the same.”
- “The formal requirements of a motion to remand and a motion to reopen are the same.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trott, Thomas, Hogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.