Skip to main content
· 8/24/2001

Romelia Hazel Frazier v. Delco Electronics Corporation

Citations

  • 263 F.3d 663
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19149
  • 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,692
  • 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1043
  • 2001 WL 964933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The stalking victim who doesn’t know that she is being stalked is not in fear of being in- jured.”
  • “The stalking victim who doesn’t know that she is being stalked is not in fear of being in- jured.”
  • \[A] violation of Title VII that is based on a claim of harassment by a coworker doesn't occur until the employer has failed to take reasonable steps to bring the harassment to an end.\
  • “[A] violation of Title VII that is based on a claim of harassment by a coworker doesn’t occur until the employer has failed to take reasonable steps to bring the harassment to an end.”
  • “[A] violation of Title VII that is based on a claim of harassment by a coworker doesn’t occur until the employer has failed to take reasonable steps to bring the harassment to an end.”
  • “A jury might find that Spears’s persistent, crazy, hostile behavior toward Frazier after his threat to kill her was sufficiently ominous to make the workplace intolerable even to a person of average steadfastness.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.