· 8/24/2001
Romelia Hazel Frazier v. Delco Electronics Corporation
Citations
- 263 F.3d 663
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19149
- 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,692
- 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1043
- 2001 WL 964933
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The stalking victim who doesn’t know that she is being stalked is not in fear of being in- jured.”
- “The stalking victim who doesn’t know that she is being stalked is not in fear of being in- jured.”
- \[A] violation of Title VII that is based on a claim of harassment by a coworker doesn't occur until the employer has failed to take reasonable steps to bring the harassment to an end.\
- “[A] violation of Title VII that is based on a claim of harassment by a coworker doesn’t occur until the employer has failed to take reasonable steps to bring the harassment to an end.”
- “[A] violation of Title VII that is based on a claim of harassment by a coworker doesn’t occur until the employer has failed to take reasonable steps to bring the harassment to an end.”
- “A jury might find that Spears’s persistent, crazy, hostile behavior toward Frazier after his threat to kill her was sufficiently ominous to make the workplace intolerable even to a person of average steadfastness.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Posner, Ripple
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.