Rome Industrial Insurance v. Eidson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where the company reserved to itself the question of satisfaction, it would be changing the contract to hold that what would satisfy a reasonable man would answer the terms of the [contract].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Rome Industrial Insurance v. Eidson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Rome Industrial Insurance v. Eidson
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1914-08-18· cited 5×