Rombola v. Cosindas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• race horse’s proven ability and consistent winnings, in various conditions, sufficient to support recovery of prospective profits for period plaintiff was deprived of its use
• “In determining the amount of damages to be awarded, mathematical accuracy of proof is not required.”
• a witness’s opinion “would ... be admissible as evidence of the extent of damages if his qualifications as an expert witness are accepted by the trial judge”
• horse trainer sued owner for percentage of gross purse horse would have won if owner had not removed horse from racing meets
• “In determining the amount of damages to be awarded, mathematical accuracy of proof is not required. The likelihood of prospective profits may be proved by an established earnings record.”
• \While it is possible that no profits would have been realized . . . that possibility is inherent in any business venture. It is not sufficient to foreclose [the plaintiff's] right to prove prospective profits.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).