Romberger v. Henry
Citations
- 167 Pa. 314
- 31 A. 634
- 1895 Pa. LEXIS 902
Syllabus
<p>Execution — Imprisonment for debt — Gapias ad satisfaciendum — Negligence — Judgment.</p> <p>A capias ad satisfaciendum may issue upon a judgment recovered by an employee against his employer for personal injuries caused by the negligence of the employer in not furnishing the employee with suitable appliances for the work.</p> <p>The duty of an employer to furnish his employee with suitable appliances arises by implication of law out of the relations of the parties; it is imposed by law, not created by contract, and therefore is not within the exemption of the act of July 12, 1842, P. L. 339, relating to imprisonment for debt.</p>
Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.