Skip to main content
· 4/8/1895

Romberger v. Henry

Citations

  • 167 Pa. 314
  • 31 A. 634
  • 1895 Pa. LEXIS 902

Syllabus

<p>Execution — Imprisonment for debt — Gapias ad satisfaciendum — Negligence — Judgment.</p> <p>A capias ad satisfaciendum may issue upon a judgment recovered by an employee against his employer for personal injuries caused by the negligence of the employer in not furnishing the employee with suitable appliances for the work.</p> <p>The duty of an employer to furnish his employee with suitable appliances arises by implication of law out of the relations of the parties; it is imposed by law, not created by contract, and therefore is not within the exemption of the act of July 12, 1842, P. L. 339, relating to imprisonment for debt.</p>

Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.