Romar Transports v. Iron and Steel Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim for replevin was subject to arbitration because it was a controversy “touching or arising ... out of the[ ] contract” and that by filing counterclaim for replevin and obtaining such affirmative relief, party waived right to arbitration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).