· 12/19/1995
Romano v. Village of Glenview
Citations
- 660 N.E.2d 56
- 213 Ill. Dec. 799
- 277 Ill. App. 3d 406
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that, although the injunction in that case may have required the expenditure of money, injunctive relief did not constitute damages under the Tort Immunity Act
- determining that, although the injunction in that case may have required the expenditure of money, injunctive relief did not constitute damages under the Tort Immunity Act
- determining that, although the injunction in that case may have required the expenditure of money, injunctive relief did not constitute damages under the Tort Immunity Act
- Tort Immunity Act did not apply to action seeking injunctive relief even though defendant would be required to expend money to provide the requested relief
- a municipality's decision to dig retaining ponds on a golf course near the plaintiff homeowners' property, which resulted in flooding, was an \unreasonable\ interference with homeowners' property rights and not subject to immunity from injunctive relief
- Tort Immunity Act did not apply to action seeking injunctive relief even though defendant would be required to expend money to provide the requested relief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.