Skip to main content
· 12/19/1995

Romano v. Village of Glenview

Citations

  • 660 N.E.2d 56
  • 213 Ill. Dec. 799
  • 277 Ill. App. 3d 406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that, although the injunction in that case may have required the expenditure of money, injunctive relief did not constitute damages under the Tort Immunity Act
  • determining that, although the injunction in that case may have required the expenditure of money, injunctive relief did not constitute damages under the Tort Immunity Act
  • determining that, although the injunction in that case may have required the expenditure of money, injunctive relief did not constitute damages under the Tort Immunity Act
  • Tort Immunity Act did not apply to action seeking injunctive relief even though defendant would be required to expend money to provide the requested relief
  • a municipality's decision to dig retaining ponds on a golf course near the plaintiff homeowners' property, which resulted in flooding, was an \unreasonable\ interference with homeowners' property rights and not subject to immunity from injunctive relief
  • Tort Immunity Act did not apply to action seeking injunctive relief even though defendant would be required to expend money to provide the requested relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.