Romanik v. Buitrago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• extrinsic evidence allowed where contract specified general address of condominium complex, but did not identify specific condominium unit
• description of property was adequate even though it identified condominium to be sold only as “3200 Clairmont Drive,” which was the address for the whole complex
• extrinsic evidence allowed where contract specified general address of condominium complex, but did not identify specific condominium unit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).