Romanelli, Ronald v. Suliene, Dalia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court acted within its discretion in permitting use of plaintiff’s felony convictions for sexual assault and bail jumping for impeachment
• holding that it is difficult to make an accurate determination regarding a plaintiff’s ability to litigate the matter when case is still in “its infancy”
• holding that it is difficult to make an accurate determination regarding a plaintiff’s ability to litigate the matter when case is still in “its infancy”
• explaining that the denial of a motion to recruit counsel was justified by the district court's finding that the plaintiff had not tried to obtain counsel
• finding that \any accurate determination regarding [a litigant's] abilities or outcomes of the lawsuit\ to be \impossible\ when a case is \still in its infancy\
• finding that \any accurate determination regarding [a litigant's] abilities or outcomes of the lawsuit\ to be \impossible\ when a case is \still in its infancy\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).