Skip to main content
· 4/17/1992

Roman v. U.S. Parole Commission

Citations

  • 790 F. Supp. 1068
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6946
  • 1992 WL 99231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding RFRA unconstitutional on separation of powers grounds; staying trial pending outcome of interlocutory appeal of issue to Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
  • holding RFRA unconstitutional under the separation of powers doctrine
  • finding RFRA unconstitutional because it violates the separation of powers doctrine
  • finding RFRA unconstitutional because it violates the separation of powers doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.