Skip to main content
· 6/15/1964

Roman v. Sincock

Citations

  • 377 U.S. 695
  • 84 S. Ct. 1449
  • 12 L. Ed. 2d 620
  • 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the Con- stitution requires “faithful adherence to a plan of population-based representation, with such minor deviations only as may occur in recognizing certain factors that are free from any taint of arbitrariness or discrimination” (emphasis added)
  • describing-how she intentionally took all of southern Georgia, “lassoed it in as if it were one big-district,” and created a series of districts with negative population deviations in the region
  • “[T]hey didn’t want to lose any more representation out of rural south Georgia than they had to”
  • “[The negative deviations] are in south Georgia because those folks wanted to minimize their loss of power.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Stewart, Sims, Harlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.