· 6/15/1964
Roman v. Sincock
Citations
- 377 U.S. 695
- 84 S. Ct. 1449
- 12 L. Ed. 2d 620
- 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1006
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the Con- stitution requires “faithful adherence to a plan of population-based representation, with such minor deviations only as may occur in recognizing certain factors that are free from any taint of arbitrariness or discrimination” (emphasis added)
- describing-how she intentionally took all of southern Georgia, “lassoed it in as if it were one big-district,” and created a series of districts with negative population deviations in the region
- “[T]hey didn’t want to lose any more representation out of rural south Georgia than they had to”
- “[The negative deviations] are in south Georgia because those folks wanted to minimize their loss of power.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warren, Stewart, Sims, Harlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.