· 5/5/2010
Roman v. Potter
Citations
- 604 F.3d 34
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9225
- 109 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 228
- 2010 WL 1781950
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming summary judgment for defendant where record indicated no evidence of pretext and retaliatory animus
- Courts need not credit inferences that rely on tenuous insinuation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch, Torruella, Selya
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.