Skip to main content
· 5/5/2010

Roman v. Potter

Citations

  • 604 F.3d 34
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9225
  • 109 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 228
  • 2010 WL 1781950

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment for defendant where record indicated no evidence of pretext and retaliatory animus
  • Courts need not credit inferences that rely on tenuous insinuation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Torruella, Selya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.