Roman v. Horsley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Idaho Code section 72-102 to affirm an Idaho Industrial Commission determination that an individual was an employee for purposes of a workers’ compensation claim
• “[T]he fact that there was no withholding of taxes did not diminish the neutrality of the payment factor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kiele v. Steve Henderson Logging
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1995-11-01· cited 13×
• Moore v. Moore
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2011-02-02· cited 10×
• Livingston v. Ireland Bank
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1995-08-31· cited 10×
• Stoica v. Pocol
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2001-12-28· cited 7×
• Industrial Commission v. Sky Down Skydiving
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2020-04-16· cited 4×
• Casey v. Sevy
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1996-06-18· cited 3×
• Travelers Insurance v. Ultimate Logistics
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2020-06-18

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Burdick v. Thornton
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1985-12-13· cited 26×
• Burns v. Nyberg
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1985-03-26· cited 18×
• J.R. Simplot Co. v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1986-04-18· cited 11×
• Matter of Hanson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1988-04-22· cited 6×
• Partello v. Stipa
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1989-01-19· cited 1×