Roman Catholic Diocese v. Sylvia Burwell, Secretar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “RFRA confers no right to challenge the independent conduct of third parties . . . .”
• RFRA does not entitle plaintiffs to block third parties such as the government or insurers from engaging in conduct with which the plaintiffs disagree
• \The Hobby Lobby Court ... actually suggested in dictum that the accommodation does not burden religious exercise ....\
• “We begin and end our analysis with the substantial-burden prong. The plaintiffs must show that the challenged regulations substantially burden their religious exercise . . . .”
• \[T]he plaintiffs claim that their completion of Form 700 or submission of a notice to HHS will authorize or trigger payments for contraceptives. Not so. The ACA already requires contraceptive coverage ....\
• “RFRA confers no right to challenge the independent conduct of third parties....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).