Roman Catholic Church of St. Anthony of Padua v. Pennsylvania R.
Citations
- 207 F. 897
- 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1663
Syllabus
<p>1. Nuisance (§ 3*)—Injuries to Property from Operation—“Actionable Nuisance.”</p> <p>The consequential, incidental, and unavoidable annoyance or damage resulting to the occupiers of land adjacent to a duly authorized railroad from its nonnegligent and careful operation docs not constitute an “actionable nuisance,” irrespective of the extent of such annoyance or damage.</p> <p>[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Nuisance, Cent. Dig. §§ 4, 5, 9-25; Dec. Dig. § 3.*</p> <p>For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, vol. 1, p. 149.]</p> <p>2. Constitutional Law (§ 278*)—Eminent Domain (§ 2®)—'Takings of Property Without Compensation—Damages from Operation of Railroad.</p> <p>Nor does the causing of such damage to the property owner by such nonnegligent operation of the railroad constitute a taking or appropriation of his property without due process of law, or just compensation, in violation of the Constitution of the United States.</p> <p>[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Constitutional Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 763, 765, 767-770. 772-777, 779-806, 808-810, 816-824, 907-924, 912; Dec. Dig. § 278;* Eminent Domain, Cent. Dig. §§ 3-12; Dee. Dig. § 2.*</p> <p>Consequential and indirect damages, see note to 16 C. C. A. 468.]</p>
Judges: Gray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.