· 4/28/2005
Roman Catholic Bishop v. Superior Court
Citations
- 28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 355
- 128 Cal. App. 4th 1155
- 2005 Daily Journal DAR 4941
- 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3612
- 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 683
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “noting 18 that “numerous federal and California decisions have held that there is no constitutional 19 impediment” to legislation that revives a “lapsed civil limitations period”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rubin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.