Skip to main content
· 4/28/2005

Roman Catholic Bishop v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 355
  • 128 Cal. App. 4th 1155
  • 2005 Daily Journal DAR 4941
  • 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3612
  • 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “noting 18 that “numerous federal and California decisions have held that there is no constitutional 19 impediment” to legislation that revives a “lapsed civil limitations period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rubin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.