Roman Catholic Archdiocese v. City of East Orange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that prison’s library system had not satisfied constitutional demands because “the inmate could obtain state[-]law materials only by providing precise citations[] and could obtain precise citations only if he could refer to state[-]law materials”
• upholding facial adequacy of access plan, but not foreclosing future challenge to plan as implemented
• upholding facial adequacy of access plan, but not foreclosing future challenge to plan as implemented
• upholding facial adequacy of access plan, but not foreclosing future challenge to plan as implemented
• upholding facial adequacy of access plan, but not foreclosing future challenge to plan as implemented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).