Romak Usa, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. Marc Rich Marc Rich & Co., Holding Gmbh, a Swiss Corporation, Formerly Known as Marc Rich & Co. Holding Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a court “must view the evidence in the light most favorable to [plaintiffs] and resolve factual conflicts in its favor.”
• “[W]e must view the evidence in the light most favorable to [the plaintiff] and resolve factual conflicts in its favor.... ”
• one telephone call not shown to give rise to the causes of action insufficient to render conferral of specific personal jurisdiction proper
• “[Activities of an agent within a state may support personal jurisdiction of a nonresident principal.”
• “The cause of action must arise out of or relate to a defendant’s activities within a state.”
• in considering the jurisdictional contacts of an agent with a particular state, so as to be imputed to the principal, the court looked at the scope of authority attributable to the agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).