Rolston v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “clear and convincing evidence” is “higher than ‘more probable than not,’ but not as high as ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ ”
• instructing jurors to “Ask yourselves, for example, was [Polizzi] not only intellectually able to understand, but was he emotionally able to realize the nature and quality or wrongfulness of his acts?”
• the defendant claimed that he had intended to turn his collec- tion of child pornography over to the police to help chil- dren

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).