Rolls-Royce PLC v. Royal Caribbean Cruises

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that misconduct claims did not “arise out of or relate to” shipbuilding agreements because resolution of the claims did not “require reference to or construction of the shipbuilding agreements”
• rejecting a non-signatory’s motion to compel arbitration in part because the claim did not arise out of or relate to the agreement
• declining to compel arbitration because a cruise line company’s claim that a subcontractor’s negligent design, manufacture, and repair of propulsion pod was independent of the cruise line’s contract with a general contractor to build the cruise ship
• “Resolution of the claims raised against Rolls–Royce does not require reference to or construction of the shipbuilding agreements between Royal Caribbean and CAT.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).