Rollins v. United States Department of State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that agencies may not ignore “clear leads” that indicate “other offices that should have been searched” (emphasis in original)
• withholding “the name of a third party on a cover memo that transmitted the reports of two deaths abroad”
• also describing search as one for “any correspondence between” Huber and the senior DOJ officials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).